ENSPRYNG offers a well-studied safety profile, with a median exposure of 5 years

Quick Links

The rates of serious AEs were comparable between ENSPRYNG and placebo in both clinical trials4,13,14*

SAkuraStar: median ~2 years of safety data in monotherapy3,49

Adverse reactions that occurred in ≥4 patients treated with ENSPRYNG

Patients (%)

ENSPSRYNG
(n=41)

Placebo
(n=23)

Rash

17

0

Arthralgia

17

0

Pain in extremity

15

9

Fatigue

15

4

Nausea

15

9

Nasopharyngitis

12

4

Pruritis

10

0

Depression

10

0

Cellulitis

10

0

Neutropenia

10

4

Blood creatine phosphokinase increased

10

4

Fall

10

4

SAkuraSky: median ~3 years of safety data for ENSPRYNG + IST3,49†‡

Adverse reactions that occurred in ≥3 patients treated with ENSPRYNG

Patients (%)

ENSPSRYNG + IST
(n=26)

Placebo + IST
(n=26)

Nasopharyngitis

31

15

Headache

27

12

Upper respiratory tract infection

19

12

Gastritis

15

0

Arthralgia

12

0

Pharyngitis

12

8

*The safety population included patients who received at least one dose of ENSPRYNG or placebo and included AQP4-seropositive and AQP4-seronegative patients.13,14
Placebo patients were observed for a median of ~1 year.3
All patients were concurrently receiving immunosuppressive therapy, which included oral corticosteroids, azathioprine, or mycophenolate mofetil.3

Additional safety information49,50

  • In SAkuraStar, no patients in the ENSPRYNG arm discontinued due to adverse events vs 1 placebo patient (4.3%); in SAkuraSky, 3 (11.5%) ENSPRYNG-treated patients discontinued due to adverse events vs 3 treated with IST alone (11.5%)
  • The rates of adverse events were similar for ENSPRYNG and placebo patients in both trials. The majority of adverse reactions were mild to moderate in nature

Injection-related reactions3

  • In both trials, the incidence was comparable between ENSPRYNG (9%) and placebo (8%)
  • Reactions in ENSPRYNG patients were predominantly mild to moderate in severity and most occurred within 24 hours of an injection
  • The most commonly reported systemic symptom was diarrhea. The reported local injection site reactions were pruritus, injection site reaction, and skin mass
  • No patients left the trials due to injection-related reactions

Lab abnormalities

  • Clinically meaningful changes in neutrophil counts and liver enzymes were observed, and patients should be monitored periodically3
  • Neutrophil count: One patient in SAkuraStar treated with ENSPRYNG had a neutrophil count <0.5 x 109/L, and 1 patient in SAkuraSky discontinued ENSPRYNG because of neutropenia. The majority of neutrophil decreases were transient or intermittent in nature3,5
  • Liver enzymes: In both trials, the majority of the elevations were below 3x ULN, were transient, and resolved without interruption. Elevations of ALT or AST greater than 3x ULN occurred in 3% of ENSPRYNG patients compared to no placebo patients3,5
  • Platelet count: None of the patients experienced a decrease in platelet count to below 50 x 109/L. Decreases in platelet counts were not associated with bleeding events in the clinical trials3,5

ENSPRYNG offers an established long-term safety profile, with a median exposure of 5 years4

SAkuraMoon§ included 106 patients who completed SAkuraStar and SAkuraSky

Patients from both studies entered the open-label extension period at CEC-confirmed relapse or at completion of the double-blind period.

The overall ENSPRYNG treatment period was defined as follows:

  • For ENSPRYNG-treated patients: double-blind + open-label extension periods
  • For placebo patients: switched to ENSPRYNG at start of open-label extension periods
  • Safety assessments compared the rates of AEs per 100 patient-years (PY) in the overall vs the double-blind periods
  • Median ENSPRYNG exposure was 5.0 (0.1-7.9) years

§SAkuraMoon is a single-arm, open-label study that enrolled patients who had completed the double-blind periods and open-label extensions of SAkuraSky and SAkuraStar.
CEC-confirmed PDR or clinical relapse requiring rescue therapy in SAkuraSky; CEC-confirmed PDR in SAkuraStar. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, home dosing of ENSPRYNG was permitted from April 2020 onwards.

Limitations of the open-label, uncontrolled study period51

  • Patients in the open-label extension period successfully completed the controlled period and are subject to continued dropout; they may represent an enriched population. Conclusions regarding the safety of ENSPRYNG cannot be drawn on the basis of open-label extension data
The rates of AEs and serious AEs# for ENSPRYNG were similar in the double-blind and overall treatment periods4
  • There were no deaths or anaphylactic reactions related to treatment with ENSPRYNG
  • All injection-related reactions were nonserious, and none led to treatment discontinuation or interruption
  • Longer exposure to ENSPRYNG in the overall treatment period was not associated with a higher risk of severe (CTCAE grade ≥3) laboratory changes versus the double-blind periods

#The most common serious AEs in the placebo ± IST for the SAkuraSky double-blind period were under the MedDRA system organ classes: blood and lymphatic disorders, and infections and infestations.
Serious adverse events are any adverse events that are fatal, life threatening, require hospitalization, result in disability or incapacity, cause congenital anomalies or birth defects, and/or are judged by investigators to be significant medical events.

The rates of infections and serious infections** for ENSPRYNG were similar in the double-blind and overall treatment periods4

SAkuraMoon infections and serious infections4
  • In both periods, the most common infections with ENSPRYNG were upper respiratory tract infections and urinary tract infections

**MedDRA system organ class: infections and infestations.
AE=adverse event; CEC=clinical endpoint committee; CI=confidence interval; CTCAE=Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; IST=immunosuppresive therapy; PDR=protocol-defined relapse; PY=patient years; R=randomization; SC=subcutaneous.

Icon showing mechanism of action
See how ENSPRYNG is thought to work

Due to its role in NMOSD, interleukin-6 is an important therapeutic target.13,23-25

ENSPRYNG dosing and administration

ENSPRYNG is the only monthly subcutaneous treatment for NMOSD3

Important Safety Information & Indication

Indication

ENSPRYNG is indicated for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) in adult patients who are anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody positive.

Contraindications

ENSPRYNG is contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to satralizumab or any of the inactive ingredients, an active hepatitis B infection, or active or untreated latent tuberculosis.

Warnings and Precautions

Infections
An increased risk of infections, including serious and potentially fatal infections, has been observed in patients treated with IL-6 receptor antagonists, including ENSPRYNG. The most common infections reported in a randomized clinical trial of patients treated with ENSPRYNG who were not on other chronic immunosuppressant therapies, and that occurred more often than in patients receiving placebo, were nasopharyngitis (12%) and cellulitis (10%). The most common infections in patients who were on an additional concurrent immunosuppressant, and that occurred more often than in patients receiving placebo, were nasopharyngitis (31%), upper respiratory infection (19%), and pharyngitis (12%). Delay ENSPRYNG administration in patients with an active infection, including localized infections, until the infection is resolved.

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Reactivation
Risk of HBV reactivation has been observed with other immunosuppressant therapies. Patients with chronic HBV infection were excluded from clinical trials. Perform HBV screening in all patients before initiation of treatment with ENSPRYNG. Do not administer ENSPRYNG to patients with active hepatitis. For patients who are chronic carriers of HBV [HBsAg+] or are negative for HBsAg and positive for HB core antibody [HBcAb+], consult liver disease experts before starting and during treatment with ENSPRYNG.

Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis has occurred in patients treated with other IL-6 receptor antagonists. Patients should be evaluated for tuberculosis risk factors and tested for latent infection prior to initiating ENSPRYNG. Consider anti-tuberculosis therapy prior to initiation of ENSPRYNG in patients with a history of latent or active tuberculosis in whom an adequate course of treatment cannot be confirmed, and for patients with a negative test for latent tuberculosis but having risk factors for tuberculosis infection. Consult infectious disease experts regarding whether initiating anti-tuberculosis therapy is appropriate before starting treatment. Patients should be monitored for the development of signs and symptoms of tuberculosis with ENSPRYNG, even if initial tuberculosis testing is negative.

Vaccinations
Live or live-attenuated vaccines should not be given concurrently with ENSPRYNG because clinical safety has not been established. Administer all immunizations according to immunization guidelines at least 4 weeks prior to initiation of ENSPRYNG for live or live-attenuated vaccines and, whenever possible, at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of ENSPRYNG for non-live vaccines.

Elevated Liver Enzymes
Mild and moderate elevations of liver enzymes have been observed in patients treated with ENSPRYNG at a higher incidence than in patients receiving placebo. ALT and AST levels should be monitored every 4 weeks for the first 3 months of treatment, followed by every 3 months for one year, and thereafter, as clinically indicated.

Decreased Neutrophil Counts
Decreases in neutrophil counts were observed in patients treated with ENSPRYNG at a higher incidence than placebo. Neutrophil counts should be monitored 4 to 8 weeks after initiation of therapy, and thereafter at regular clinically determined intervals.

Hypersensitivity Reactions
Hypersensitivity reactions, including rash, urticaria, and fatal anaphylaxis, have occurred with other IL-6 receptor antagonists.

Use in Specific Populations

Pregnancy
Pregnancy Exposure Registry
There is a pregnancy exposure registry that monitors pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to ENSPRYNG during pregnancy. Healthcare providers are encouraged to register patients and pregnant women are encouraged to register themselves by calling 1-833-277-9338.

There are no adequate data on the developmental risk associated with the use of ENSPRYNG in pregnant women. In an animal reproduction study, no adverse effects on maternal animals or fetal development were observed in pregnant monkeys and their offspring, with administration of ENSPRYNG at doses up to 50 mg/kg/week. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defect and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2 – 4% and 15 – 20%, respectively. The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown.

Lactation
No information is available on the presence of ENSPRYNG in human milk, the effects of ENSPRYNG on the breastfed infant, or the effects of ENSPRYNG on milk production. ENSPRYNG was excreted in the milk of lactating monkeys administered ENSPRYNG throughout pregnancy. Human IgG is excreted in human milk and the potential for absorption in the infant is unknown. The developmental and health benefits of breastfeeding should be considered along with the mother’s clinical need for ENSPRYNG and any potential adverse effects on the breastfed infant from ENSPRYNG or from the underlying maternal condition.

Pediatric Use
Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established.

Geriatric Use
Clinical studies of ENSPRYNG did not include sufficient numbers of patients aged 65 years and older to determine whether they respond differently from younger patients. However, population pharmacokinetic analyses in patients with NMOSD did not show that age affected the pharmacokinetics of ENSPRYNG. In general, caution should be used when dosing the elderly, reflecting the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, or cardiac function, and of concomitant diseases or other drug therapy.

Most Common Adverse Reactions
The most common adverse reactions (≥15% in either trial) were nasopharyngitis (31%), headache (27%), upper respiratory tract infection (19%), rash (17%), arthralgia (17%), extremity pain (15%), gastritis (15%), fatigue (15%), and nausea (15%).

You may report side effects to the FDA at (800) FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch. You may also report side effects to Genentech at (888) 835-2555.

For additional safety information, please see the full Prescribing Information and Medication Guide.

    • Wingerchuk DM, Hogancamp WF, O'Brien PC, Weinshenker BG. The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic's syndrome). Neurology. 1999;53(5):1107-1114. doi:10.1212/wnl.53.5.1107

      Wingerchuk DM, Hogancamp WF, O'Brien PC, Weinshenker BG. The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic's syndrome). Neurology. 1999;53(5):1107-1114. doi:10.1212/wnl.53.5.1107

    • George M, Gantioque R. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: an early diagnosis to prevent blindness and paraplegia. J Nurse Pract. 2023;19(7):104654. doi:10.1016/j.nurpra.2023.104654

      George M, Gantioque R. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: an early diagnosis to prevent blindness and paraplegia. J Nurse Pract. 2023;19(7):104654. doi:10.1016/j.nurpra.2023.104654

    • ENSPRYNG [prescribing information]. South San Francisco, CA: Genetech, Inc. 2022.

      ENSPRYNG [prescribing information]. South San Francisco, CA: Genetech, Inc. 2022.

    • Weinshenker B, Yeaman MR, de Seze J, et al. Long-term safety of satralizumab in adults with aquaporin-4-IgG-seropositive (AQP4-IgG+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Presented at: the 75th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology; April 22-27, 2023; Boston, MA.

      Weinshenker B, Yeaman MR, de Seze J, et al. Long-term safety of satralizumab in adults with aquaporin-4-IgG-seropositive (AQP4-IgG+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Presented at: the 75th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology; April 22-27, 2023; Boston, MA.

    • Yamamura T, Weinshenker B, Yeaman MR, et al. Long-term safety of satralizumab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) from SAkuraSky and SAkuraStar. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;66:104025. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2022.104025

      Yamamura T, Weinshenker B, Yeaman MR, et al. Long-term safety of satralizumab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) from SAkuraSky and SAkuraStar. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;66:104025. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2022.104025

    • FDA approves Genentech’s Enspryng for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. News release. Genentech, Inc. August 14, 2020. Accessed February 10, 2025. https://www.gene.com/media/press-releases/14873/2020-08-14/fdaapproves-genentechs-enspryng-for-neu

      FDA approves Genentech’s Enspryng for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. News release. Genentech, Inc. August 14, 2020. Accessed February 10, 2025. https://www.gene.com/media/press-releases/14873/2020-08-14/fdaapproves-genentechs-enspryng-for-neu

    • Songwisit S, Kosiyakul P, Jitprapaikulsan J, Prayoonwiwat N, Ungprasert P, Siritho S. Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil therapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16727. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73882-8

      Songwisit S, Kosiyakul P, Jitprapaikulsan J, Prayoonwiwat N, Ungprasert P, Siritho S. Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil therapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16727. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73882-8

    • Anderson M, Levy M. Advances in the long-term treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2024;16:11795735241231094. doi:10.1177/11795735241231094

      Anderson M, Levy M. Advances in the long-term treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2024;16:11795735241231094. doi:10.1177/11795735241231094

    • Sellner J, Sitte HH, Rommer PS. Targeting interleukin-6 to treat neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: Implications from immunology, the FcRn pathway and clinical experience. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26(7):1591-1601. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2021.03.018

      Sellner J, Sitte HH, Rommer PS. Targeting interleukin-6 to treat neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: Implications from immunology, the FcRn pathway and clinical experience. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26(7):1591-1601. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2021.03.018

    • Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

      Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

    • Kümpfel T, Giglhuber K, Aktas O, et al. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part II: Attack therapy and long-term management [published correction appears in J Neurol. 2024 Jun;271(6):3702-3707. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12288-2.]. J Neurol. 2024;271(1):141-176. doi:10.1007/s00415-023-11910-z

      Kümpfel T, Giglhuber K, Aktas O, et al. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part II: Attack therapy and long-term management [published correction appears in J Neurol. 2024 Jun;271(6):3702-3707. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12288-2.]. J Neurol. 2024;271(1):141-176. doi:10.1007/s00415-023-11910-z

    • Jarius S, Wildemann B, Paul F. Neuromyelitis optica: clinical features, immunopathogenesis and treatment. Clin Exp Immunol. 2014;176(2):149-164. doi:10.1111/cei.12271

      Jarius S, Wildemann B, Paul F. Neuromyelitis optica: clinical features, immunopathogenesis and treatment. Clin Exp Immunol. 2014;176(2):149-164. doi:10.1111/cei.12271

    • Traboulsee A, Greenberg BM, Bennett JL, et al. Safety and efficacy of satralizumab monotherapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(5):402-412. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30078-8

      Traboulsee A, Greenberg BM, Bennett JL, et al. Safety and efficacy of satralizumab monotherapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(5):402-412. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30078-8

    • Yamamura T, Kleiter I, Fujihara K, et al. Trial of Satralizumab in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(22):2114-2124. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1901747

      Yamamura T, Kleiter I, Fujihara K, et al. Trial of Satralizumab in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(22):2114-2124. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1901747

    • Huda S, Whittam D, Bhojak M, Chamberlain J, Noonan C, Jacob A. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Clin Med (Lond). 2019;19(2):169-176. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-169

      Huda S, Whittam D, Bhojak M, Chamberlain J, Noonan C, Jacob A. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Clin Med (Lond). 2019;19(2):169-176. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-169

    • Chihara N, Aranami T, Sato W, et al. Interleukin 6 signaling promotes anti-aquaporin 4 autoantibody production from plasmablasts in neuromyelitis optica. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(9):3701-3706. doi:10.1073/pnas.1017385108

      Chihara N, Aranami T, Sato W, et al. Interleukin 6 signaling promotes anti-aquaporin 4 autoantibody production from plasmablasts in neuromyelitis optica. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(9):3701-3706. doi:10.1073/pnas.1017385108

    • Kawachi I, Lassmann H. Neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017;88(2):137-145. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2016-313300

      Kawachi I, Lassmann H. Neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017;88(2):137-145. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2016-313300

    • Briggs FB, Shaia J. Prevalence of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in the United States. Mult Scler. Published online January 27, 2024. doi:10.1177/13524585231224683

      Briggs FB, Shaia J. Prevalence of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in the United States. Mult Scler. Published online January 27, 2024. doi:10.1177/13524585231224683

    • Glisson CC. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD): clinical features and diagnosis. UpToDate website. Updated January 7, 2025. Accessed February 10, 2025. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/neuromyelitis-optica-spectrum-disorder-nmosd-clinical-features-and-diagnosis.

      Glisson CC. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD): clinical features and diagnosis. UpToDate website. Updated January 7, 2025. Accessed February 10, 2025. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/neuromyelitis-optica-spectrum-disorder-nmosd-clinical-features-and-diagnosis.

    • Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Lucchinetti CF, Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG. The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(9):805-815. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70216-8

      Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Lucchinetti CF, Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG. The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(9):805-815. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70216-8

    • Knapp RK, Hardtstock F, Wilke T, et al. Evaluating the economic burden of Relapses in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Real-World Analysis Using German Claims Data. Neurol Ther. 2022;11(1):247-263. doi:10.1007/s40120-021-00311-x

      Knapp RK, Hardtstock F, Wilke T, et al. Evaluating the economic burden of Relapses in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Real-World Analysis Using German Claims Data. Neurol Ther. 2022;11(1):247-263. doi:10.1007/s40120-021-00311-x

    • Carnero Contentti E, Rojas JI, Cristiano E, et al. Latin American consensus recommendations for management and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders in clinical practice [published correction appears in Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 Jul;52:103026. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103026.]. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;45:102428. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2020.102428

      Carnero Contentti E, Rojas JI, Cristiano E, et al. Latin American consensus recommendations for management and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders in clinical practice [published correction appears in Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 Jul;52:103026. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103026.]. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;45:102428. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2020.102428

    • Heo YA. Correction to: Satralizumab: First Approval. Drugs. 2020;80(14):1483. doi:10.1007/s40265-020-01391-z

      Heo YA. Correction to: Satralizumab: First Approval. Drugs. 2020;80(14):1483. doi:10.1007/s40265-020-01391-z

    • Takeshita Y, Obermeier B, Cotleur AC, et al. Effects of neuromyelitis optica-IgG at the blood-brain barrier in vitro. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016;4(1):e311. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000311

      Takeshita Y, Obermeier B, Cotleur AC, et al. Effects of neuromyelitis optica-IgG at the blood-brain barrier in vitro. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016;4(1):e311. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000000311

    • Obermeier B, Daneman R, Ransohoff RM. Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier. Nat Med. 2013;19(12):1584-1596. doi:10.1038/nm.3407

      Obermeier B, Daneman R, Ransohoff RM. Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier. Nat Med. 2013;19(12):1584-1596. doi:10.1038/nm.3407

    • Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2015;85(2):177-189. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001729

      Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology. 2015;85(2):177-189. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001729

    • Shah K, Maghsoudlou P. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): the basics. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2016;77(7):C98-C101. doi:10.12968/hmed.2016.77.7.C98

      Shah K, Maghsoudlou P. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): the basics. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2016;77(7):C98-C101. doi:10.12968/hmed.2016.77.7.C98

    • Jeyalatha MV, Therese KL, Anand AR. An Update on the Laboratory Diagnosis of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. J Clin Neurol. 2022;18(2):152-162. doi:10.3988/jcn.2022.18.2.152

      Jeyalatha MV, Therese KL, Anand AR. An Update on the Laboratory Diagnosis of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders. J Clin Neurol. 2022;18(2):152-162. doi:10.3988/jcn.2022.18.2.152

    • Smith AD, Moog TM, Burgess KW, McCreary M, Okuda DT. Factors associated with the misdiagnosis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023;70:104498. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2023.104498

      Smith AD, Moog TM, Burgess KW, McCreary M, Okuda DT. Factors associated with the misdiagnosis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023;70:104498. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2023.104498

    • Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. National Organization for Rare Disorders website. Updated July 27, 2022. Accessed February 20, 2025. https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/neuromyelitis-optica/.

      Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. National Organization for Rare Disorders website. Updated July 27, 2022. Accessed February 20, 2025. https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/neuromyelitis-optica/.

    • Long Y, Liang J, Wu L, et al. Different Phenotypes at Onset in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Patients with Aquaporin-4 Autoimmunity. Front Neurol. 2017;8:62. doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00062

      Long Y, Liang J, Wu L, et al. Different Phenotypes at Onset in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Patients with Aquaporin-4 Autoimmunity. Front Neurol. 2017;8:62. doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00062

    • Kim HJ, Paul F, Lana-Peixoto MA, et al. MRI characteristics of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: an international update. Neurology. 2015;84(11):1165-1173. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001367

      Kim HJ, Paul F, Lana-Peixoto MA, et al. MRI characteristics of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: an international update. Neurology. 2015;84(11):1165-1173. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001367

    • Cheng C, Jiang Y, Lu X, et al. The role of anti-aquaporin 4 antibody in the conversion of acute brainstem syndrome to neuromyelitis optica. BMC Neurol. 2016;16(1):203. doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0721-1

      Cheng C, Jiang Y, Lu X, et al. The role of anti-aquaporin 4 antibody in the conversion of acute brainstem syndrome to neuromyelitis optica. BMC Neurol. 2016;16(1):203. doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0721-1

    • Paul F, Marignier R, Palace J, et al. International Delphi consensus on the management of AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD: recommendations for eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2023;10(4):e200124. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000200124

      Paul F, Marignier R, Palace J, et al. International Delphi consensus on the management of AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD: recommendations for eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2023;10(4):e200124. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000200124

    • Delgado-Garcia G, Lapidus S, Talero R, Levy M. The patient journey with NMOSD: From initial diagnosis to chronic condition. Front Neurol. 2022;13:966428. doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.966428

      Delgado-Garcia G, Lapidus S, Talero R, Levy M. The patient journey with NMOSD: From initial diagnosis to chronic condition. Front Neurol. 2022;13:966428. doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.966428

    • Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

      Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

    • SOLIRIS [prescribing information]. Boston, MA: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2024.

      SOLIRIS [prescribing information]. Boston, MA: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2024.

    • ULTOMIRIS [prescribing information]. Boston, MA: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2024.

      ULTOMIRIS [prescribing information]. Boston, MA: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2024.

    • UPLIZNA [prescribing information]. Deerfield, IL: Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc. 2021.

      UPLIZNA [prescribing information]. Deerfield, IL: Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc. 2021.

    • FDA Approves Roche’s ENSPRYNG for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD). Media release. Roche. August 16, 2020. Accessed February 10, 2025. https://www.roche.com/media/releases/med-cor-2020-08-17#:~:text=Roche%20(SIX%3A%20RO%2C%20ROG,optica%20spectrum%20disorder%20(NMOSD).

      FDA Approves Roche’s ENSPRYNG for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD). Media release. Roche. August 16, 2020. Accessed February 10, 2025. https://www.roche.com/media/releases/med-cor-2020-08-17#:~:text=Roche%20(SIX%3A%20RO%2C%20ROG,optica%20spectrum%20disorder%20(NMOSD).

    • Barros PO, Cassano T, Hygino J, et al. Prediction of disease severity in neuromyelitis optica by the levels of interleukin (IL)-6 produced during remission phase. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016;183(3):480-489. doi:10.1111/cei.12733

      Barros PO, Cassano T, Hygino J, et al. Prediction of disease severity in neuromyelitis optica by the levels of interleukin (IL)-6 produced during remission phase. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016;183(3):480-489. doi:10.1111/cei.12733

    • Levy M, Fujihara K, Palace J. New therapies for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(1):60-67. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30392-6

      Levy M, Fujihara K, Palace J. New therapies for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(1):60-67. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30392-6

    • Efficacy and safety study of satralizumab (SA237) as monotherapy to treat participants with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02073279. Updated March 1, 2023. Accessed February 10, 2025. https:// clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02073279

      Efficacy and safety study of satralizumab (SA237) as monotherapy to treat participants with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02073279. Updated March 1, 2023. Accessed February 10, 2025. https:// clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02073279

    • Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

      Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

    • Efficacy and safety study of satralizumab (SA237) as add-on therapy to treat participants with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and NMO spectrum disorder (NMOSD). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02028884. Updated April 18, 2023. Accessed February 10, 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ study/NCT02028884

      Efficacy and safety study of satralizumab (SA237) as add-on therapy to treat participants with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and NMO spectrum disorder (NMOSD). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02028884. Updated April 18, 2023. Accessed February 10, 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ study/NCT02028884

    • Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

      Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

    • Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

      Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

    • Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

      Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

    • Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

      Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

    • Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

      Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

    • Kleiter I, Traboulsee A, Palace J, et al. Long-term Efficacy of Satralizumab in AQP4-IgG-Seropositive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder From SAkuraSky and SAkuraStar. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2022;10(1):e200071. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000200071

      Kleiter I, Traboulsee A, Palace J, et al. Long-term Efficacy of Satralizumab in AQP4-IgG-Seropositive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder From SAkuraSky and SAkuraStar. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2022;10(1):e200071. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000200071

    • Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.

      Data on file. Genentech, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.